Queen Elizabeth II, the UK’s longest-reigning monarch, died Thursday. Overseas coverage leaders and specialists at Stanford celebrated her lifelong devotion to her nation and contribution to cultural unity, whereas some criticized the colonialist legacy of her reign.
The blended response mirrors the worldwide response to the Queen’s dying. Nationwide leaders from across the globe despatched their condolences, praised her devotion to her topics and intend to attend her funeral. Nonetheless, residents, in addition to political social gathering leaders in former British colonies similar to India and African nations, additionally criticized her lack of acknowledgement of the British empire’s colonial atrocities.
“For greater than 70 years, Queen Elizabeth II led a life completely devoted, to not herself, however to the service of her nation and topics,” wrote Hoover Establishment Director and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice in a press release to The Each day. “Her Majesty remained all the time a gentle hand, even all through probably the most making an attempt of occasions. Our hearts each break for and stand in solidarity with our British pals. Might God bless her reminiscence and should she relaxation in everlasting peace.”
The queen ascended to the throne after the dying of her father, King George VI, on Feb. 6, 1952. She took a ceremonial position, because the monarchy misplaced governing energy in 1649, however she used her standing to offer management as the UK culturally reworked from early twentieth century imperialism to a extra liberal period. She shaped a bond along with her folks by delivering common televised addresses from early in her reign. More and more, the queen opened public entry to her household with common occasions and several other documentaries.
Christophe Crombez Ph.D. ’94, a political science professor and senior analysis fellow on the Freeman Spogli Institute for Worldwide Research (FSI) Europe Heart, wrote that Queen Elizabeth “did an incredible job” staying throughout the boundaries of her constitutional monarchy and offering “a way of unity and goal to a rustic that in any other case appears a bit misplaced and hasn’t dealt effectively with its decreased stature in world politics.”
Crombez additionally wrote that respecting the bounds of the monarchy’s energy is very beneficial in in the present day’s polarized political local weather. Whereas her dying’s impression on British insurance policies shall be minimal, “the disappearance of a logo of UK unity could make it tougher to maintain the UK collectively,” Crombez wrote.
“If King Charles doesn’t handle to remain inside his position, expresses his personal opinions too typically (as he has previously), and doesn’t handle to offer a way of unity, which may be an issue for the UK and the survival of the monarchy,” Crombez wrote.
Equally, Anna Grzymala-Busse, director of The Europe Heart and senior fellow at FSI and Hoover, wrote in an electronic mail to the Each day that the queen demonstrated that “even within the period of mass media and world commerce, a monarch can train huge delicate energy.”
The Queen typically traveled world wide within the capability of a diplomat. She visited the Bay Space in 1983, the place she met with former California governor after which President Ronald Reagan. She then spoke at Stanford College and impressed group members along with her real curiosity in scholar life and college administration.
Grzymala-Busse wrote that the Queen “offered symbolic continuity” to the UK. Nonetheless, she emphasised that her presence might do little to unravel “the mess of British politics today,” referring to the resignation of Prime Minister Boris Johnson in July, the following political turmoil, and financial inflation and stagnation.
Priya Satia, who’s a world historical past professor with a specialization within the historical past of the British Empire, was extra essential of the Queen’s life and management.
Satia wrote that the Crown, together with Queen Elizabeth II, “merged with the tradition of celeb” for survival and that the Queen didn’t acknowledge the lasting results of the UK’s imperial previous. It was “troublesome to think about the late Queen’s private decency” in a vacuum, faraway from the legacy of the British Crown, Satia wrote.
“The British Crown has not acknowledged the wealth it accrued from colonialism and slavery or its position in presiding over such actions via the Queen’s reign,” Satia wrote. “One hopes that the brand new king could present higher ethical braveness as Britons and other people world wide face the existential local weather threats unleashed by colonial capitalism.”
This text has been corrected to mirror that Satia was referring to the legacy of the British Crown, not British imperialism, in her quote in regards to the late Queen’s private decency. The Each day regrets this error.